Classification in Psychopathology: Realism, Fallibilism, and a Dimensional Approach
G. Scott Acton
Northwestern University
- What is This Article About?
- Time for a Change
- What Makes a Bad Diagnostic Scheme?
- If Human Artifacts, then Constructionism is Appropriate
- Human Artifacts
- Constructionism
- Inductivism and the Atheoretical Basis
- Inductivism in the Context of Discovery
- Inductivism in the Context of Justification
- Operationism and Infallibilism
- Classical Sets and the Categorical Approach
- Intensions Versus Extensions
- Categories Based on Infallible Operationism
- What Makes a Good Diagnostic Scheme?
- If Natural Kinds, then Realism is Appropriate
- Natural Kinds
- Realism
- Copy Theory of Truth
- Critical Realism
- Theories that Outpace the Facts
- Empirical Discovery and Fallibilism
- Fuzzy Sets and the Dimensional Approach
- Examples
- Double Depression: The Ultimate Wrong Approach to Psychopathology
- The Heterogeneity of Symptoms of Depression
- The Bad: A Categorical Approach Based on Infallible Indicators
- The Good: A Dimensional Approach Based on Fallible Indicators
- The Heterogeneity of Symptoms of Schizophrenia
- The Bad: A Categorical Approach Based on Infallible Indicators
- The Good: A Dimensional Approach Based on Fallible Indicators
- The Dimensionality of Schizoaffective Disorder
- The Dimensionality of Mixed Anxiety and Depression
- The Dimensionality of Bipolar Disorder
- The Bad: Three Unrelated Disorders, BP-I, BP-II, and Cyclothymia, and Normal Diurnal Rhythms
- The Good: One Dimension of Severity
- The Dimensionality of Personality Disorders
- Goal-Directed Learning: The Positive Heuristic and Creating the Concepts We Need
- Goal-Directed Theory Construction and the Future of Psychodiagnosis
- Epilogue: Fallibilism and the Open Society